This site hosts random ideas and experiences, I also publish security & privacy work.
While updating my main site—markn.ca—I archived a lot of posts. These posts are still available on the site, but they aren’t included in any indices or lists. You have to search for them or use a direct link. For posts that were completely out of date and no longer relevant (specific technical tips, event announcements, posts linked to company work, etc.), but posts that I wanted to keep as part of my larger body of work ended up archived.
To help contextual those posts, I wrote a few summary posts. I want these posts—and others moving forward—to better reflect my voice. I realize that even with my best efforts, I can fall into the “business person” voice a little too easily. I want to be a better writer and a huge step along that path is being more expressive.
My first summary post was, “My years on CBC”.
The first draft wasn’t great. I managed to get the key ideas onto the page, but the length and pacing were off. I also meandered a lot when trying to add personal touches. I had just renewed my Google Workspace plan and remembered that as a part of that Google was forcing their Gemini AI integrations on to everyone.
While I’m not a fan of using generative AI to create writing from bullet lists, I believe there’s a lot of untapped potential is using it as an editor to help clean up one’s own writing. It’s integrated into Google Docs as a side panel and has access to the current document by default. Using my first draft, of the entire post, I started the editing process.
In this post, I wanted to highlight the process of drilling down on the intro. I got a lot out of the editing workflow and wanted to share.
This document is a blog post that summarizes my experience being a technology expert and columnist on Canada’s CBC network (radio, tv, online). Please evaluate the post as an editor for a publication like the New Yorker. The tone should be personal, but still snappy and concise. What can I improve about this writing?
Here’s an evaluation of your blog post, keeping a New Yorker-esque tone in mind:
Overall Impression:
The piece has a good, conversational voice and a clear narrative arc. It effectively conveys your experience at the CBC and your growth as a communicator. However, it could benefit from tighter prose, more vivid imagery, and a touch more introspection.
Areas for Improvement:
Original: It struck me as I looked around. No one would ever believe this.
I could picture in my head chatting with friends while sharing a meal and setting this scene for a story. Anyone listening would take it for artistic license and not an accurate recounting.
But, it was all true.
Revised: The scene was absurd, undeniably so. Surrounded by glossy magazine covers featuring Canada’s who’s-who, a Tim Hortons tea warming my hands, and the faint echo of hockey highlights from a nearby display, I sat in an Air Canada lounge, preparing to broadcast to the province. It felt like a setup for a tall tale, the kind you’d spin over dinner with friends, only to have them chuckle and call it artistic license. But every bit of it was true.
By incorporating these suggestions, you can elevate your blog post from a good personal account to a more polished and engaging piece of writing.
It struck me as I looked around. No one would ever believe this.
I could picture in my head chatting with friends while sharing a meal and setting this scene for a story. Anyone listening would take it for artistic license and not an accurate recounting.
But, it was all true.
Having just passed a hockey display in the hallway, I took a seat in a conference room in the Air Canada lounge. Surrounded by magazine covers depicting Canadians and Canadiana of note, I sipped on a Tim Hortons (tea, not a double-double) waiting to broadcast to the province on CBC Radio.
I giggled quietly, half expecting a Mountie to ride by chasing an errand moose. Or perhaps a Québécois lumberjack struggling to carry a mountain of pancakes covered in fresh maple syrup.
As the time to air drew near, I smiled broadly and enjoyed the moment of levity inside my Canadian cliché.
I updated the intro (from this 👆 draft) and asked Gemini, “I’ve rewritten the intro. Does it better reflect the initial feedback?”
Yes, the revised opening is a significant improvement! It now has a much stronger sense of place and a more engaging tone. Here’s a breakdown of why it’s better and a few additional tweaks:
What’s improved:
Example of slightly further revised:
“Walking past the display of Leafs memorabilia, I turned the corner, opened the door, and took a seat in the conference nestled in the Air Canada lounge. Surrounded by glossy magazine covers featuring Canada’s who’s-who, a Tim Hortons tea scorchingly hot on the desk, I waited to join the province-wide broadcast on CBC Radio. I giggled quietly, half-expecting a Mountie on a moose, or a lumberjack with a precarious stack of syrup-drenched pancakes. It was a tableau of almost comically Canadian imagery. That didn’t diminish my enjoyment of the moment, and the smile stayed with me the rest of the day.”
Overall, the changes you’ve made are excellent. The opening now effectively sets the scene, establishes your voice, and draws the reader in.
Taking the feedback into account, I made some edits and tightened up the introduction then asked, “Ok, please check the intro again”
Here’s an updated evaluation of your intro, now with the full context of the document in mind:
Current Intro: Walking past the display of Leafs memorabilia, I turned the corner, opened the door, and took a seat in the conference nestled in the Air Canada lounge. Surrounded by magazine covers featuring Canada’s who’s-who, a Tim Hortons tea scorchingly hot on the desk, I waited to join the province-wide broadcast on CBC Radio.
I giggled quietly, half expecting a Mountie on a moose or a Québécois lumberjack with a mountain of syrup-drenched pancakes to pass by at any moment.
It felt deeply Canadian. Yes, an unbelievable, absurd, comical amount of Canadianess. That didn’t diminish my enjoyment of the moment and the smile that stayed with me the rest of the day.
Evaluation and Suggestions:
Changes and Why:
This revised intro maintains the strengths of your original while refining the language, tightening the flow, and adding a bit more depth. It better aligns with the tone and style I think would suit this piece.
Made more updates. “Third time’s the charm?”
Third time’s definitely a charm! Your intro is really solid now, and it sets up the rest of the post nicely. Here’s my final evaluation of just the intro:
Current Intro: Walking past the display of Leafs memorabilia, I turned the corner, opened the door, and found myself in a conference room tucked away in the Air Canada lounge. I chuckled at the framed magazine covers adorning the walls with a who’s-who of Canada. I set my scorchingly hot Tim Hortons tea on the desk and waited to join the province-wide broadcast on CBC Radio.
In that pause, I took a moment of self-reflection and giggled quietly, half expecting a Mountie on a moose or a Québécois lumberjack with a mountain of syrup-drenched pancakes to pass by.
It felt deeply Canadian. Yes, an unbelievable, absurd, comical amount of Canadianess compressed into one moment, but that didn’t diminish my enjoyment. The smile that spread across my face stayed with me the rest of the day.
Final Evaluation:
Overall: The intro is now very strong. It’s descriptive, engaging, and sets the tone for the rest of the post. It effectively captures the absurdity and joy of the moment, which is exactly what you want in an opening.
With the intro in such good shape, I suggest focusing on polishing the other sections of your post. Pay attention to the same principles of vivid imagery, strong verbs, and concise writing as you move through the rest.
The original intro:
It struck me as I looked around. No one would ever believe this.
I could picture in my head chatting with friends while sharing a meal and setting this scene for a story. Anyone listening would take it for artistic license and not an accurate recounting.
But, it was all true.
Having just passed a hockey display in the hallway, I took a seat in a conference room in the Air Canada lounge. Surrounded by magazine covers depicting Canadians and Canadiana of note, I sipped on a Tim Hortons (tea, not a double-double) waiting to broadcast to the province on CBC Radio.
I giggled quietly, half expecting a Mountie to ride by chasing an errand moose. Or perhaps a Québécois lumberjack struggling to carry a mountain of pancakes covered in fresh maple syrup.
As the time to air drew near, I smiled broadly and enjoyed the moment of levity inside my Canadian cliché.
The final after 3 rounds of edits:
Walking past the display of Leafs memorabilia, I turned the corner, opened the door, and took a seat in the conference tucked away in the Air Canada lounge. I chuckled at the framed magazine covers adorning the walls with a who’s-who of Canada. I set my scorchingly hot Tim Hortons tea on the desk and waited to join the province-wide broadcast on CBC Radio.
In that pause, I took a moment of self-reflection and giggled quietly, half expecting a Mountie on a moose or a Québécois lumberjack with a mountain of syrup-drenched pancakes to pass by.
It felt deeply Canadian. Yes, an unbelievable, absurd, comical amount of Canadian-ness compressed into one moment, but that didn’t diminish my enjoyment. The smile that spread across my face stayed with me the rest of the day.
You can read the final post over on my main site at, “My years on CBC”.